By using this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. To find out more visit our privacy policy.
Padua Prediction Score (PPS)
Summary
What it measures:
A screening tool that measures the risk of venous thrombus embolism (VTE).
Target Population:
Validated for use with:
- Nonsurgical hospitalized patients1
- Recently hospitalized patients (up until 90 days post admission)1
- Non-ambulatory patients2
TASKFORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
Role of Physical Therapists in the Management of Individuals at risk for or Diagnosed with Venous Thromboembolism Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline 2022 strongly recommends that physical therapists assess risk of venous thrombus embolism (VTE) in patients with reduced mobility. The Padua Prediction Score (PPS) is included in this guideline as a risk assessment model that is particularly useful for hospitalized patients.
American Heart Association's Call to Action to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients recommends assessing and reporting VTE risk in all hospitalized patients and lists PPS as a tool to help identify nonsurgical hospitalized patients who may benefit from VTE prophylaxis.3
CLINICAL INSIGHTS
Assessing risk of VTE as part of physical therapist examination "will improve patient care by identifying those patients who would benefit from additional information on risk mitigation, such as hydration and the benefit of mobility". 2
The Padua Prediction Score is a simple risk assessment measure (RAM) that inpatient therapists, and outpatient and home health therapists who work with recently hospitalized and/or non-ambulatory patients, can use to increase awareness of patients who are at increased risk of developing VTE. This tool should be used as a guide in conjunction with the physical therapist's clinical judgement.
A PPS score of >4 indicates high risk of VTE. The physical therapist should provide patient education as above and alert the attending provider for potential additional prophylactic management.
There are other RAMs with greater sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power (such as Caprini, Khorana), but those screens include a longer list of predisposing factors, making them more cumbersome to use. Clinicians can consider using one of these tools in patients who have risk factors that PPS does not address.
Additionally, if the health care organization the physical therapist works at uses another risk assessment measure, the PT should use the one chosen by their organization for consistency in communicating the risk of VTE across the spectrum of caregivers.2
Members Only Content
Join APTA to get unlimited access to content including evidence-based research, guidance on payment changes, and other resources to help you thrive. Learn more about membership benefits.
Already a member? Log in
Date:
Contact: practice@apta.org
Content Type: Test & Measure
Colleen McAllister, PT, DPT
Kelly Danks, PT, DPT Board-Certified Clinical Specialist in Geriatric Physical Therapy; Shawn Shermer, PT, DScPT
You Might Also Like...
CPG
APTA Academy of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Physical Therapy and Academy of Acute Care: Role of Physical Therapists in the Management of Individuals at Risk for or Diagnosed With Venous Thromboembolism: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline 2022 (CPG+)Aug 1, 2022
This update of a 2016 guideline provides assistance to physical therapists in the decision-making process when treating patients at risk for venous thromboembolism
CPG
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for ResuscitationNov 5, 2020
The European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 provide specific instructions for how resuscitation should be practiced and take into
CPG
American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care - 2020Oct 21, 2020
Provides updates in technology and scientific knowledge to effectively translate the science of resuscitation into clinical care and improved